NASA has just released a 4K
video tour of Earth’ moon and the footage will make your jaw drop. Even though
Earth’s moon can be viewed in unprecedented detail from Earth, NASA has
recently released a video filmed in 4k showing off the surface of the moon in
unprecedented close-up detail, and the video will definitely take your breath
away.
How can we describe the
video footage? Well, it’s stunning. It’s mesmerizing. It’s Fresh. It offers an
entirely new way of exploring the surface of the moon, and you can see all of
the most important and prominent features of the Earth’s satellite in the
stunning video footage.
The footage dubbed as
“virtual tour of the moon” in breathtaking 4K has been collected by NASA’s
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft over a span of nine years.
“The tour visits a number of
interesting sites chosen to illustrate a variety of lunar terrain features,”
Ernie Wright of NASA’s Space Visualization Studio explained in a blog post.
“Some are on the near side and are familiar to both professional and amateur
observers on Earth, while others can only be seen clearly from space.”
Wright explains that this
recently published video is, in fact, an updated version of another one
released 7 years ago, in 2011. Despite the fact that the camera path may be the
same, the data that has been gathered in 7 years has made it possible for NASA
to create a far more incredible and detailed presentation of the moon.
The recently released 4k
video displays a number of the moon’s features, combining colors that highlight
important or noteworthy data to make sure you not only enjoy the view but learn
something new. One of the most interesting parts of the video is when we have
the chance to fly over the Tycho Crater, a lunar formation said to be around
100 million years old.
The video zooms in
unprecedently, focusing on Tycho Crater’s mesmerizing central peak which
features an enigmatic 100-meter-wide bolder at the summit, “the origins of
which are still a mystery,” the video’s narrator says, adding to the suspense.
Read more here.
Its a "boulder" not a "bolder"
ReplyDeleteYes, and I thought than spelling was easier than sending a spaceship around the moon. Obviously I was wrong.
DeleteThere is only one Hohmann Transfer solution for any given set of launch conditions, but language mutates like a bastard, and the "spellcheck gotchas" don't help.
DeleteAnd I thought "that" had a "t" at the end...
Delete*it’s
DeleteWow, the irony of all the mistakes... pointing out the mistake. LOL We should all look in the mirror before we criticize. ;)
DeleteThe mooxers will simply claim this is all CGI directed by Kubrick, produced by Disney, for NASA (paid for by the Illuminati and the Reptilians). --> Sent on my ReptoiPhone from our double super secret base on the dark side of the holographic Moon. Don't tell anybody.
ReplyDeleteWell, at least we would know how crazy they are, given that Kubrick has been dead for almost 20 years.
DeleteOr has he?!
DeleteI swear I thought your name was "Martian"...
DeleteRidicule is the weakest argument technique. Sadly, the most effective.
DeleteFor those who don't want to watch the entire video, the landing site shows up around 3:35
ReplyDeleteThere was no landing site. The landings were proven to be fake in the last centuary,. Wake up for fox sake.
DeleteNice CGI
ReplyDeleteNasa used 'Pixar' to produce this imagery,no doubt....lol
ReplyDeleteNah, If Pixar had dome it we would have seen Buzz Lightyear planting a flag on the surface.
DeleteDid he actually say 'Perpetual darkness' or 'Perpetual light'? seriously?
ReplyDeletesigh.... who wrote this stuff? Obviously not someone that can claim being an astronomer.
the lunar poles are paradoxical places that feature both permanently dark and permanently sunlit sites — depending on whether they're the bottom of a crater/trench or the peak of a mountain
DeleteDoes your country suffer from people who think the Moon Landings were a Hoax? People who believe the Democratic Fallacy that their scientific ignorance is as valid as your scientific knowledge? The good people at Clavius Base have compiled debunking information arranged by topic!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.clavius.org
Does your country suffer from people who think the Moon Landings were a HoaX.
DeletePeople don't think it was a hoax, they know darned well it was a hoax, all 9 of of them. Time you had a reality check, because that Clavius site is utter BS and has not been updated for over 20 years. Loads more evidence has surfaced that proves beyond any doubt the Apollo Moon missions were all faked for propaganda purposes, and too instil pride in American citizens.
Time you looked at the NASASCAM site and it's relevant links. The NASASCAM site is updated every 12 months, unlike the Clavius site, which is not even mobile friendly. What a joke that Clavius site is. If it were me I would remove it completely as it has become a worldwide laughing stock and an embarrassment for the idiot who set up the site.
Clavius have not debunked any solid evidence the landings were fake, in fact they have not debunked anything, so stop telling BS that they have.
Oh, the geeks are at it again! Let's point out all the grammar and spelling errors because, "hey I'm smarter then everyone else!" because I'm a geek! Hope it makes you feel better about your social misfit selves.
ReplyDeleteBit fucked in the head are we?
DeleteSo..how is it explained that humans could pass safely through the Van Allen radiation belt?
ReplyDeleteNo body seems to care about issue 1, much less the other 500.
Delete"Charged particles are damaging to human bodies, but the amount of damage done can range from none to lethal, depending on the energy those particles deposit, the density of those particles, and the length of time you spend being exposed to them.
DeleteIn the case of the Apollo missions, the solution was to minimize the second two factors. We can’t control the energy of those particles, though they can be large. The density of the Van Allen belts is well known (from sending uncrewed probes through them), and there are hotspots you can definitely avoid. In particular, the innermost belt is a rather tightly defined region, and it was possible to stay out of it for the trip to the Moon. The second belt is much larger, and harder to avoid, but there are still denser regions to avoid. For the Apollo trips, we wanted to send the astronauts through a sparse region of the belts, and to try and get through them quickly. This was necessary in any case; the crafts had to make it to the Moon in a reasonable amount of time, and the shorter the trip, the less exposure to all sorts of radiation the astronauts would get."
src: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jillianscudder/2017/06/16/astroquizzical-van-allen-belts-barrier-spaceflight/#65d37fee6f8d
If this discussion was "science" or "exploration", question would be welcome. Ridicule, shame, insult is the mark of a myth supported by "church ladies" and religious kooks.
ReplyDeleteNice that NASA LRO over 9 yrs. ago was able to pick up the lapels left on the moon in English, so we can see just what the debris is - might have missed it. I've been working on "Remote Viewing" of the moon for several month and I've found the 1st difficulty is getting rid of the views implanted in my mind by "stunning" shit like this. The dramatic music is the sure tip-off a a load of crap coming.
ReplyDeleteWell debunk this:-
ReplyDeletenasascam.atspace.co.uk
The skin of the LEM was approx. the thickness of your Alcoa Wrap foil in your kitchen drawer. The boys pressurized the compartment after crawling inside, taking off the moon suits, and getting some sleep, Neil said it was cold! The temp. outside was a blistering 250 on the bright side and (-) 250 on the shade side - Wow! Take a guess at the pressure that aluminum foil was subjected to, for hours. Geez! I'd have a hard time sleeping with that perfect vacuum just outside that 60's aluminum foil - Ouch!
ReplyDeleteAwesome and interesting article. Great things you've always shared with us. Thanks. Just continue composing this kind of post. https://newswatchtv.com/2019/04/01/best-4k-projector-for-home/
ReplyDeleteChristofer Döss Sex Exhib & Public Masturbator
ReplyDeleteI am a free spirit, an artist soul expressing my emotions and true inner being with my naked body.
I'm also an influential sexual exhibitionist and a bisexual life enjoying nude model loving to be sexually exposed publicly online, with thousands of fans from all over the world.
Many of them not only admires my nude work but also wanna become just like me.
My name is Christofer Döss Sex Exhib, aka nakencrille the bisexual Public Masturbator - and I'm so comfy with who I am and where I'm headed. Sooo proud of it too.
Publishing sexy nude pix and hot cum vidz of myself and telling the world who I really am on public websites is not just a turn-on for me it also has become a way of life for the last decade — a beautiful, wonderful and really really REALLY awesome life.
The best thing is that my thousands of world wide fans loves it as much as I do, and they let me know that, like hundreds of times a day — and the amount of fans grows steadily.
What can I say more than I really enjoy this life — or as I use to tag: #LoveThisLife.
3> 3> 3> 3> 3> 3> 3> 3> 3> 3> 3>
#freespirit #getnaked #nude #naturephotography #getyourassintonature #nakedadventures #nudewalks #mynudefreedom #outdooradventurephotos #nakedhiking #handsome #malenude #malebody #nudebody #nakedfreedom #nothingtohide #outofcloset #closetnomore #comingout #bisexual #sexualexhibitionist #publicmasturbator
http://christoferdoss.blogspot.com
http://www.twitter.com/chriswedenxxx
https://twitter.com/thechristoferdo
Unbelievable that in 2024 there are millions who still believe in this croc of shit. Explain how the video ends the Moon landing conspiracy? The Moon landing conspiracy ended in the last centuary when it was proven beyond all doubt that the landings were faked. A conspiracy is when there is doubt about the true story of any event. Read comments from people who worked on the Apollo program and claim it was faked. View site at
ReplyDelete